I think it's whom because it makes more scenes that way.
The Enlightenment thinkers correctly matched is A. John Locke - natural rights.
<h3>
Enlightenment thinkers </h3>
Enlightenment thinkers are philosophers that questioned traditional authority and pressed on the notion that human reasoning could be improved through rationality. These thinkers added value to reason, science, religion and “natural rights” such as life, liberty, and property.
Who were the Enlightenment thinkers ?
We are more concerned about;
John Locke debated that natural rights which include life, liberty, and property should never be denied an individual or surrendered by a person as it was given by nature.
Jean- Jacques Rousseau believed in introducing political and ethical thinking into new channels. He sharpened music, arts and trade.
Baron de Montesquieu proposed that the best form of government was one built on the delegation of power and kept in check to avoid one from becoming too powerful in the expense of the other.
Hence, the Enlightenment thinkers correctly matched is John Locke ( natural rights).
<em>What was the significance of the peasants revolt?</em>
<em></em>
The Peasants Revolt 1381. The Peasants Revolt of 1381 was the first popular uprising in England. The peasants were objecting to high taxation and demanding payment of wages in money. They marched on London, but were fooled by the King, and their leader, Wat Tyler, murdered.
Answer:
4:7
20 divided by 4 = 5
So 5X7= 35.
There are now 35 girls in the club.
New ratio: 20:35
Simplify it.
The simplest form of 20/35 is 4/7.
This IS NOT A TYPO. This IS NOT INCORRECT.
Since we multiplied by 5, and both 20 and 35 are divisible by 5, is will always be 4/7 if you multiply it by 5 in simplest terms.
One more boy joins.
Now the ratio is 5/7.
5/7 cannot be simplified, therefore, 5/7 simplified is 5/7.
Hope this helps!!
Brown vs. The Board of Education was a case tried by the Supreme Court from 1952-1954, in which the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Brown, saying that for public schools to separate black and white students was unconstitutional.
