Because San Antonio <span>was too far from the Texan settlements in the east.</span>
Answer:
appeasement
Explanation:
there was an attempt to appease hitler, by allowing him to take over a country and no more, however after he took the rhineland and nothing happened he carried on with other countries, namely czechoslovakia soon after
Answer:
Since the 1824 decision in Gibbons v. Ogden, the Court’s understanding of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause has expanded tremendously. This evolution was particularly dramatic in the New Deal era, when the Court adopted a broader view of Congress’s interstate commerce powers and upheld many of President Roosevelt’s economic programs.
I hope that helped
Answer:
take the case to the United States Supreme Court
Explanation:
From the scenario given, it can be inferred that the case has been decided at the court of the first instance, which is the lower court.
Also, the court has been decided at the first appellate court, which is the court of appeals. Then If Wag's lawyer wants to appeal this decision, (, the decision of the court of appeal) he will " take the case to the United States Supreme Court."
This is because it is the Supreme Court that has jurisdiction over the appeal courts.
Note: since it is not specified that the case is exclusive of the state laws, then it is assumed that the automobile accident, in this case, involved federal laws.
Hence, the next step is to "take the case to the United States Supreme Court"
Court orders in which a judge requires authorities to prove that a prisoner is being held lawfully and that allows the prisoner to be freed if the judge is not persuaded by the governments case. Habeas corpus rights imply that prisoners have a right to know what charges are being made against them.
I am going to say that it is citizens cannot be punished without a trial.
