Answer:
The one-child policy was the population control policy in force in the People's Republic of China from 1979 to 2015, whereby each couple was only allowed to have one child; having a second child was punishable. The aim of this policy was to slow down population growth.
The economic and social consequences of the Chinese one-child policy could severely limit the Chinese economy and society, partly because of the rapidly increasing aging population as a result of this policy. That is why the one-child policy was increasingly abandoned. For example, two out of three Chinese families were later allowed to have two children.
However, it had positive effects in terms of maintaining the country's natural resources, as it somewhat curbed their massive consumption.
In India, another country with 1 billion inhabitants, a two-child policy was pursued, but due to the high illiteracy, little has happened.
Answer:
European Immigrants were instead given their own land in land lotteries I believe. Sorry 4 small answer i need to troll :9
Explanation:
Many longitudinal studies have shown that INCREASED <span> anger during adolescence is normal, but that most adolescents express their anger in ACCEPTABLE ways.
The increase in aggressiveness couldn't be controlled by the teenager because it's influenced by our bodily hormones. But the way we express that anger could be controlled. On example is if we expressing it through arts or physical activities rather than vandalism / violence.</span>
Answer:
adjective, un·health·i·er, un·health·i·est. not in a state of good or normal health; in an unsound, weak, or morbid condition. symptomatic of or resulting from bad health: an unhealthy pallor. not conducive to good health; unhealthful: Night air was formerly considered unhealthy. they just ain't taking good care of themselves and eat junk all the time too
Tax reductions mean that more disposable income is available to people. But the increase in consumption depends on the marginal propensity to consume (MPC). If the MPC is too low, consumers will not consume the additional income made available to them through tax cuts.
