C. what conflict might arise between these characters?
1. The phrase that directly states the purpose of the Declaration of Independence is "declare the causes". That is precisely what this document did - it declared the causes for American people to break loose of British colonialism and domination, and to claim their political independence and self-determination.
2. The theme of this passage is best described as: "the British legislature extended an unwarranted jurisdiction over the colonies". The British colonial politics have transcended the boundaries, endangering the Americans' right to self-governance. That is precisely why the Americans wanted to become independent.
3. These lines are an example of ethos. Jefferson uncovers a deep ethical problem that is the basis of the British domination <span>of </span>America. He says that Americans had petitioned (therefore, they had made formal requests, they had tried all the peaceful procedures), but instead of being answered, they had suffered an even greater oppression. His conclusion that such a prince is a tyrant is ethical in nature.
4. These lines are an example of a thesis. He proclaims that they are declaring freedom and independence, so this is a thesis that needs to be explained, argued, expounded - which the document does further below. This statement is a premise which has yet to be proved with facts and arguments.
5. I believe these lines are an example of pathos. He says that people are prone to tolerating their own suffering, in order not to change the situation they are accustomed to. Pathos, as a rhetorical technique, is supposed to provoke an emotional reaction with the listeners/readers. In this case, the audience would identify with the sufferers from the passage, but would also get scared that their suffering might not come to an end. This emotional reaction is supposed to provoke action and support for Jefferson's ideas.
Clause 18 of article I, section 8, which is known as the "elastic" or "necessary and proper" clause, have effect as it gives the government the powers to adapt to the modern needs and make laws in accordance with contemporary situations.
<u>Explanation:</u>
U.S. constitution has what is known as elastic or necessary clause enshrined under Article I, section 8 and clause 18. This empowers the government to make laws on the subject matter which is otherwise not expressly listed under Article I.
It is more like a residuary clause that can be expanded like elastic to cover and issue or matter which the country is facing and there is a requirement of any law or codification on such matter or issue. Hence, it helps the government to adapt to the modern needs of the time by still being governed by the more than 200 years old constitution.
I believe that the carp represents hope in the excerpt from Wang’s “The Carp”.
