The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
Please mark me brainliest and thank me and rate me
Explanation:
Bye.
Hindi is great.
#traditional_look
The compound subject is "Young Juan and his father." Both Jaun and his father are the subjects of the sentence, but because there are two of them it means there is a compound subject.
Answer: politics
Explanation:
The underlined key words aren't shown in this situation. Despite some further searches made online regarding the question, I couldn't get the underlined words as well even though I got the excerpt.
Through the online searches, the underlined key terms mostly relates to politics. Therefore, the correct option is A.
