Japan attacked pearl harbor because of the following:
1. They need to increase their resources in preparation to their expansion in the Asia Pacific.
2. Restrictions. United States is also interested in the Asia Pacific region. They placed economic restrictions to Japan inhibiting Japanese business growth.
3. Expansion. The president of the United States bring the US Pacifc fleet to the Pearl Harbor. This is to give threat to Japan. Japan knoes that war is inevitable their move is to attacked first.
This attacked took 2500 lives of Americans, 18 ships, 300 planes but Japan did not able to exoand in the Pacific and acquisition of resouces did not happen.
Answer:
It proclaimed the freedom of slaves in the ten Confederate states still in rebellion. It also decreed that freed slaves could be enlisted in the Union Army, thereby increasing the Union's available manpower.
So I'm guessing D or B.
Essay writing is given to students in order to test their writing and reading skills.
<h3>How to write an essay?</h3>
Based on the information given, the way to write the essay will be given. Firstly, it's important to decide on your topic. In this case, it is an essay that describes how these two historical documents form their respective arguments.
Research should be done on the topic and create an essay outline. Set your argument in the introduction and develop it with evidence.
Finally, check the content, grammar, formatting, and spelling, of your essay.
Learn more about essays on:
brainly.com/question/24799048
They all stopped liking Eachother
Answer:
c.a trial by a jury of one’s peers and double jeopardy
Explanation:
The two elements of the United States’s legal system that can be traced to Roman law is "a trial by a jury of one’s peers and double jeopardy."
This is evident in the fact that in the Roman republic, the trial by a jury of one's peers is well established whereby citizens are judged by their fellow citizens rather than the Emperor or King.
Also, double jeopardy is established in roman law that a person declared acquittal by a judge in a criminal case is exempted from further proceedings under the same charges.
