The sentence which uses the past principal part, or form, of the verb sing is <u>"I have sung in chorus for one year".</u>
Verb tenses are:
- present tense
- past tense
- past participle
- present continuous
present tense: sing
past tense: sang
past participle: sung
present continuous: singing
Therefore, the past participle of "sing" is "sung"
Learn more about past participle:
brainly.com/question/19124408
Answer:
Killing should never really be considered to be justified whether in a work of fiction or not; however, Rainsford was in a position of kill or be killed. The whole thing is a case of kill or be killed, essentially self defense. I guess it depends on how you view that type of thing, but in my opinion, if Rainsford had not killed Zaroff, then he would have undoubtedly died. Therefore, yes I believe he was justified in his decision.
As with all interpretive questions, your answer is based upon your own reading of the story and how you analyze the plot and characters. Rainsford had escaped Zaroff, and won the game. There was no reason to return to the masion and kill Zaroff except to exact revenge. Consider that Rainsford himself is a hunter, used to being in power. Although he had never considered doing something as inhumane as Zaroff in hunting humans, his choice to kill Zaroff reveals his need to be in control. In this case, his killing of Zaroff isn't about justice, but about revenge.
On the other hand, there is nothing to suggest Zaroff would have quit hunting humans. He was a static character, who didn't change even when he "lost" the hunt of Rainsford. In this reading, the audience can interpret that Rainsford is doing his part for mankind by eliminating the threat of the murderer Zaroff. After all, on this island, there is no justice system by which to prosecute him.
You will need to choose the answer that best supports your understanding of the characters.
Answer: Asylees and refugees migrants flee their country becuase of danger or persucation make up small sigment of immigrants.
Explanation:
or also they will leave their country just looking for a job
I think it’s ‘in conclusion’ because you say that when you’re finished with saying what you needed to say, so therefore I don’t think that’s be a good phrase to use when you’re trying to live from one thing to another
B. Advocacy because theres no research and evidence
