All categories

3 years ago

Which is not a part of U.S. foreign policy?

History

2 answers:

AURORKA [14]3 years ago

7 0

interstate commerce its not part of us forgein policy of us rn im living in us

mezya [45]3 years ago

7 0

a) interstate commerce

Further Explanations:

The foreign policy of the United States is it's socializing with overseas nations and framed standards of association for its organizations, authorities, and system for the natives of the United States. The main motive of these policies is to build a sustainable democratic, secure and prosperous world for the welfare of the United States organizations and other international organizations. It also states that commercial linkage with other foreign nations will protect Americans abroad businesses, agreements on international Commodity, international education and also protect American Citizens living abroad. The American foreign policy is both criticized and praised both in domestic and nations and platform.

American foreign policies include diplomatic relations, trade agreements, and peacekeeping actions. The United States has participated and approved many treaties such as Arms Control Treaties, States protocols, Human Rights Treaties and free trade agreements to establisha free and friendly relation with the other nations of the World. Among all these clauses United has not Included Interstate commerce in its foreign policy that provides United States Constitution authority to regulate its commerce with other nations and within its States.

Learn More

1. courts of general jurisdiction typically have?brainly.com/question/1146662

2. in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman's favor, saying that Georgia had?brainly.com/question/2816742

3. what is a way to protect your social security number and other sensitive information from identity theft?brainly.com/question/3052744

Answer Details

Grade – High School

Subject – Economy

Chapter – Foreign Policy

Keywords:United States, overseas nations, democratic, secure, prosperous, international organizations, diplomatic relations, trade agreements, peacekeeping actions, Arms Control Treaties, States protocols, Human Rights Treaties,free trade agreements

You might be interested in

Who said that a government should be chosen by its citizens?

Roman55 [17]

Answer:

C. Enlightenment thinkers

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Warm Up: It's important that people in charge have good leadership skills. Think of a time when you’ve been on a sports team, wo

olga_2 [115]

Answer:

hi friend i need help can you answer this for me PLS

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What was the only ideal of president woodrow wilson's fourteen points the delegates at versailles voted to accept?

Alina [70]

The League of Nations

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

andrew-mc [135]

Answer:local is usually in a hidden place in the woods.

Explanation:national is in a building

3 0

3 years ago

The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam

Maksim231197 [3]

Answer: Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests. So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them. As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime." Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion. Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR. That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death. Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism. Again as noted by The Churchill Project: "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire." As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers