<span>
Let's analyze Hannah's work, step-by-step, to see if she made any mistakes. </span>In Step 1, Hannah wrote

<span> as the sum of two separate derivatives </span>

<span>using the </span><span>sum rule.
</span>
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 2,

was kept as it is, and

was rewritten as

using the constant rule.Indeed, according to the constant rule, the derivative of a constant number is equal to zero.
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 3,

was rewritten as

supposedly using the constant multiple rule.
The problem is that according to the constant multiple rule,

should be rewritten as

and not as

.
<span>
Therefore, Hannah made a mistake in this step.</span>
No it is not. They are the wrong points
1) number of cards that aren't : number of cards that are 3
we have 48 cards that arent 3 and 4 cards that are. that means that odds are:
12:1 of not drawing 3
2) fallow same logic. its just opposite.
1:12
3) same logic. but there are only 2 black 7 cards which means that odds are:
50:2 or
25:1
4) opposite of previous.
1:25
The answer here is 13. 20 divided by 4 is 5 /‘d 2 to tbe third power is 8. It is 5+8 which is 13
Answer:
Adult required in the case of “a” 28 and in the case of “b” the adult requirement is 19.
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) The percentage of adult that support the change is 20 percent.
Now calculate the number of adult required.
Given p = 0.20
Use the below condition:

Since 35 adults are already there so required adults are 63 -35 = 28
(b) The percentage of adult that support the change is 25 percent.
Now calculate the number of adult required.
Given p = 0.25
Use the below condition:

Since 35 adults are already there so required adults are 54 -35 = 19
.