What did roosevelt do to allow the us to build a canal in panama?

History

2 answers:

Strike441 [17]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Encouraged Panama to become independent from Colombia

Explanation:

The separation of Panama from Colombia was a fact occurred on November 3, 1903, after the War of a Thousand Days, and that triggered the proclamation of the Republic of Panama.

The Isthmus of Panama was an integral part of all forms of political and territorial organization that the Republic of Colombia had from 1831 to 1903, with around seventeen secession attempts and four separations consummated during the nineteenth century.

For Panamanian historiography, the proclamation of the Republic of Panama was the result of a nationalist and autonomist process that was built since the end of the 18th century, and that ended with the separation of Panama and Colombia. On the other hand, for Colombian historiography, the secession of Panama constitutes an attack on the politico-territorial integrity of Colombia, which was devised by the United States in association with the Isthmian oligarchy of the time.

SIZIF [17.4K]2 years ago

6 0

He encouraged Panama to rebel against Colombia

You might be interested in

Name 3 ways that the war had become a global war – as opposed to simply a ground war fought in Europe.

adoni [48]

<span>This question can refer to either first or second World Wars. In both cases it happened that 1) the immigrans and refugees went to other countries - such as Latin America, which affected those countries 2) almost all countries were affiliated with one or the other side - sending them ams for example 3) many other countries send their men to fight in those wars, which is why many Canadians and US-Americans fought and died in Europe</span>

4 0

3 years ago

In which era of American history is or was in cultural communication not necessary

8_murik_8 [283]

Stoner ageerrrrrrrrrrrr

7 0

2 years ago

james wants to estimate the absolute age of an animal fossil, however the test results show that that fossil doesnt contain any

____ [38]

From the provided options, the conclusion made by James regarding the lack of carbon 14 could be the use of relative dating in estimating the age of fossils.

The third option is the correct answer.

<h3>What are fossils?</h3>

Fossils are the remains of the dead organisms that are preserved for so many years in a museum.

According to the situation, James analyses that the fossils don't have any content of carbon 14 at the time of estimating the absolute age of that fossil of an animal. This happens may be due to the decay of that fossil over the years.

<u>Question's missing part:</u>

Following are the options in relation to the question:

1) Without carbon-14, it will be an impossible task to estimate the age of the fossil.

2) Finding another fossil nearby without carbon-14 will guarantee that he has matching fossils.

3) Without carbon-14, James can use relative dating to estimate the age of the fossil.

4) The animal's carbon-14 decayed long before the animal died.

5) The animal, whether living or dead, never had carbon-14 in its system.

Therefore, James can use the relative dating process in order to identify the age of an animal fossil.

Learn more about the fossils in the related link:

brainly.com/question/6867325

#SPJ1

5 0