11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
Explanation:
Industrialisation should promote economic and social development in the following ways. Industrialisation means a country can produce a wider range of higher value goods – both for sale at home and for export abroad…. ... Industrialisation leads to urbanisation – as workers flock to factories to find work….
Answer:
It the answer will be read
Answer:
The option used to revise this sentence was C. changed to a question, exclamation, or command.
Explanation:
The original sentence, "You should stand up for your rights," is conveying a suggestion. By using "should", the speaker is presenting his opinion, but not in an imperative manner. It's as if he said, "It would be good if you did this. But, whether you do it or not, it is your decision."
The revised sentence, "Stand up for your rights!", is in the imperative mood, meaning it conveys a command, an order. Unlike the original sentence, this one eliminates the suggestion of a course of action. Instead, it urges the listener to do it, to obey. A sentence in the imperative mood does not need to present a subject– it is inferred that it is the second person. It commonly begins directly with the base form of the verb; the exclamation mark is an indicative of urgency.
Answer:
I’m not happy at all
I’ll pay it
Explanation:
I’m not happy at all
I’ll pay it
What makes both of them wrong is the fact that they were both abbreviated. In a formal letter, we are supposed to keep everything whatsoever we write formal, and as such, "I'm", in place of "I am" and "I'll" in place of "I will" is quite wrong for a formal letter, since the former is an informal way of writing the later.
Changing both context however, to "I am not happy at all", and "I will pay it" makes it fit into the requirements for a formal letter.
