Concept of causation: When one event happens because of another.
In history, it is rarely the case that there is a single cause of an event. There are often multiple causes and factors and motivations that all play into the unfolding of historical happenings. Reformation historian Roland Bainton said, "The sum of the matter is that causation is exceedingly difficult to assess. One can do no more than offer a plausible conjecture." Bainton believed there were causes of events in history, but that there could be much investigation and debate about the complexity of those causes. That's part of our work as historians -- to investigate different possibilities and theses and see which are the most likely factors in causing events to unfold as they did. And as we make our assessment of causes, we remain open to the possibility that new evidence might surface that will change our understanding of causes of what happened in the past.
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
1) agricultural expansion, wood extraction
2) climate change, soil erosion
3) Deforestation not only eliminates vegetation that helps to absorb carbon dioxide from the air, but it also emits greenhouse gases. Deforestation is the second-leading contributor to global warming.
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
The ideas of the French Enlightenment philosophes strongly influenced the American revolutionaries. French intellectuals met in salons like this one to exchange ideas and define their ideals such as liberty, equality, and justice.
Bureaucracy! That is the main problem of the empire and mostly the republic. The republic fell because the size of the empire was to big, the events were moving rapidly and there was no time for bureaucracy, voting, debating and so on. When Rome became an empire it didn't of course change immediately. Some parts of the republic stayed enact. One of them was administrative bureaucracy. Luckily for the empire, after the third century crises, Diocletian started the dominate where the senate lost almost all of its power thus providing the empire with a more effective style of government where one man or two men, later three or four gave direct orders without having to debate and vote. That gave the empire 200 years more to live, although because of its size and changeable political currents it was never to last as a permanent state.
The correct answer is: C. Progressive reformers of the early 20th century
FDR took his cue from the progressive reformers who saw a more active role for the Federal government in solving problems.
