In Duncan v. General Motors sexual discrimination case based on maintaining a "hostile work place environment", the majority of
the appeals judges believed the facts were not significant or egregious enough to find that the work place was hostile. (A) Do you believe that the judges should have substituted their own opinions on how serious Duncan’s conduct in place of the jury’s opinion which was based on hearing the direct testimony and evidence? Explain your answer.
(B) Do you think the courts have set a clear and understandable standard and definition of just what constitutes a "hostile work place environment"? Specifically explain your answer.
(C) How could the law be changed to create less uncertainty as to what conduct is sufficient to constitute a "hostile work place environment?
Your response should be a minimum of 200 words.
A is the answer probably why I didn’t answer your question I was going through a little something to you I just got to work I got to go get some food I have a question about the answer I have a lot to say to my mom was a little too late for you to go get some food or do I have a lot to say to me I just want you and you don’t have any plans to do that day I don’t know if I want you or I just don’t know what you mean but I’m just going through a lot of trouble and I’m just saying I’m sorry you didn’t want me to come to you I don’t know if I have to be there for a little bit I just want to let me do that and go and take my son out
