Answer:
a specific claim about a particular subject that must be proved with evidence.
Explanation:
It makes the most sense after you use process of elimination.
You did not put any choices
Answer:The answer is. D. And
Explanation:How i know this is true is because when it says and in the sentence it is predicting another word is coming right after so there and have a great day. :) ;)
Answer:
B). Postman argues that television commercials do not use language or "tests of truth" to viewers decide whether to buy a product. Instead, they rely on images to create an emotional appeal that influences consumers' decisions.
Explanation:
The second option from the given options is not plagiarised as it paraphrases the ideas presented in the paragraph and acknowledges the author i.e. 'Neil Postman' when it says 'Postman argues.' It restates the meaning of the passage using different words that help in preventing plagiarism. The other options represent Postman's language as well as ideas without paraphrasing and acknowledgment or citation of the source that eventually plagiarizes them. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
<em>It is a shortened form of two words where one is a verb.</em>
