Everyone wants power, and then when they get the power, it can be too much for them, and they don’t know how to rationally handle it. Hope this helps!
In 2003 the U.S Supreme Court found that antisodomy laws were unconstitutional in the case of Lawrence v. Texas. In its ruling, the Supreme Court h<span>eld that intimate consensual sexual behavior </span>was<span> part of the fundamental liberties protected by substantive due process under the 14th Amendment.</span>
Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
Answer:
Equal opportunity
Explanation:
Social equality in democracy means all the people within society have equal rights, freedom of speech, expression, right to legal aid, education and have equal access to all goods services. Thus all of them are laid down in constitution.
Can i get a list of possible answers plz?
