COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
The largest and most expensive social welfare programs in
America are Social Security and Medicare. Medicare receives the funding the
most, and it is not tested program while the social security is the example of entitlement.
The Social Security Act of 1935 brought government into the equation of the
obligations of one generation to another.
Answer: False
Explanation:
If you want to hedge the risk of owning the stock then that would mean that you want to take measures to ensure that you don't lose out if prices fall.
A call option is not the way to do this because call options are bought with the expectations that prices will go up. If you buy call options then and the prices fall, you would make a loss on both the call options and the stock that you own.
A good way to hedge this would be to take Put options on the stock. Put options help you benefit if prices fall because you would be allowed to sell at a certain price unaffected by the fall in prices.
Answer:
Because he is able to cover the variable cots, he should keep going in the short run. He must increase the number of walks to cover the fixed costs.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Kay walks dogs for $7.50 each. Her total cost each day is $45—she spends $35 a day on gas driving to different neighborhoods, and her liability insurance and other fixed costs average out to $10 per day.
Kay walks five dogs a day.
Income= 7.5*5= $37.5
Total cost= 45
Loss= (7.5)
Because he is able to cover the variable cots, he should keep going in the short run. He must increase the number of walks to cover the fixed costs.
If the number is 12,759 and they ask to round to the nearest 10,000 then you look at the thousands place (where the 2 is) and is its less than 5 round down and if its more round up. so the answer would be 10,000
