A predicate noun is a noun that is part of the predicate. In the given sentences above, the sentence that contains a predicate noun is this: <span>Mario is a video-game character. The predicate noun here is video-game character. The answer would be the first one. Hope this answers your question.</span>
Answer:
<h2>Brainiest me</h2>
Explanation:
You will probably communicate differently with each of these groups of people. However, effective communication is much the same no matter with whom you are communicating.
Communication is a two-way process. You can talk as much as you want, but if nobody is listening there is no communication. When you first meet others, they will not know how you communicate or anything about you. They will probably expect you to be a reasonable person until you prove otherwise.
To start your relationship off right, and to build understanding with that person, you need to treat them with respect.
We create psychological competition with others, it pairs with jealousy, no one wants to see one do better then them, although they wish them well, we inspire others through thoughts and we don’t know it
In the excerpt from Thunberg's speech, she moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions, as explained below.
<h3>What is Thunberg's reasoning?</h3>
This question concerns the ending of the speech given by Greta Thunberg at the United Nations. Thunberg mentions the following:
- We can still have a 67% chance to stay below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise.
- To accomplish that, back in 2018, we had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit.
- However, that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
- In conclusion, our CO2 budget will be over in just 8 and a half years.
We can see that Thunberg goes from a general premise to a specific prediction about emissions. The premise consists of everything she says about the amount of CO2 we are allowed to emit. The prediction is that we will use up that amount in just 8 years.
With the information above in mind, we can select option B as the correct answer concerning Thunberg's reasoning. She moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions.
The missing excerpt is the following:
"To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise – the best odds given by the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] – the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. 1st, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
"How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just 'business as usual' and some technical solutions? With today's emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years."
Learn more about Greta Thunberg here:
brainly.com/question/28419470
#SPJ1
The correct answer is B.
The poem's description of the far focuses on natural elements, but makes no mention of man-made tools or equipment. More specifically, the poem speaks of the changing leaves, the ripe apple, the grapes hanging from the vines, and the bees buzzing around the buckwheat. The poem also notes that the family received an old-fashioned, snail mail letter, which isn't used often today.