The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
I think some have defined nineteenth-century nationalism as a "secular religion" because it was so ingrained in people's minds that seemed like they professed a religion with their nationalistic ideas. Those nationalistic ideas were so ingrained that people defended them at all cost and were the cause of many differences, and conflicts, even wars.
I don't think this could be viewed more as a God-given right or power because God did not do these things. I considered that people felt they deserve to be more and have more. That is why they set these boundaries and did not accept other nations' culture, language, history, and traditions,
Regarding Guisseppe Mazzini, I think he can be considered nationalistic. An important Italian political figure of his time, he was a supporter and promoter of the revolutionary movement in Italy that tried to unite the dispersed territories.
<span>After the War of 1812, Americans had a new view of themselves and of their nation. A sense of patriotism engulfed the country. Although there were economic issues to deal with, the war had left the nation more unified. People no longer viewed themselves as hailing from their individual states and territories, but rather as Americans. There appeared to be a greater sense of nationalism, or loyalty to the country. Such ideals held true in terms of the federal government. New leaders emerged during this time with the sole purpose of using the federal government as a means of unifying the nation.
http://aventalearning.com/content168staging/2008AmHistA/unit3/html/section_3_page_4.html
</span>
I honestly am really surprised by your question. Obviously it was done intentionally based on the status of black and white lives at the time. But it does seem implied to some degree based on our status of races today. But I wouldn't exactly say it was an oversight. If I had to make an answer right off the top of my head I would say it would be in between Intentional and it being implied. But it would be closer to intentional in my opinion.
<h3>
Intentional answer Implied</h3>
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|
(Thats my timeline)
D. equality, self-government, and multi-tiered representation
Answer:
no they did not think the stamp act was justified in fact they were angry about the Act.
Explanation:
