B!! Currently in us history and we learning about a lot right now . Definitely not the mayflower compact
Answer:
D- Australian citizens have personal freedoms while the government does also have some regulations thus making it a mixed-market economy.
Explanation:
hope this helps!
This drawing by Jacques-Louis David from the french revolution depicts at least one key moment showing the Tennis court oath.
One of the key moments in the French Revolution, the Tennis Court Oath at Versailles, is depicted in Jacques-Louis David's unfinished painting titled The Tennis Court Oath, which was created between 1790 and 1794. It was David's way of honoring the crucial Tennis Court Oath, in which the Third Estate, or the common people of France's Ancien Régime, stood defiantly against the First and Second Estates, the clergy and nobility, in the midst of the French Revolution.
They swore to remain united until a new French constitution had been adopted by taking the famous Tennis Court Oath here in these humble surroundings.
Learn to know more about the French revolution on
brainly.com/question/26322635
#SPJ4
Answer: The deaths of friends and family.
Due to the poor sanitation of the internment camps, deadly diseases such as whooping cough, measles, and dysentery spread among the Cherokee.
Explanation: In 1838 and 1839, as part of Andrew Jackson's Indian removal policy, the Cherokee nation was forced to give up its lands east of the Mississippi River and to migrate to an area in present-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee people called this journey the "Trail of Tears," because of its devastating effects.
because of its devastating effects. The migrants faced hunger, disease, and exhaustion on the forced march. Over 4,000 out of 15,000 of the Cherokees died. The Choctaws also lost several thousand people.
He would claim that it was proof of superiority. Social Darwinism is an idea that people or countries who succeed in life and who become rich did so because they could adapt to the environment and that those who are poor are inferior to them because they couldn't. In country leading, the idea is that the countries that became wealthy were superior and thus easily became rich while poor countries are inferior in their opinions.