Answer:
A major difference between the two is that Herbert Hoover was much less interventionist than Roosevelt, intervenionist meaning a person who believes the state should intervene the economy in order to fix it, instead of leaving all economic solutions to the market alone.
Hervert Hoover only reluctantly applied some interventionist policies to try to end the Great Depression: for example, signing the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1929 which allowed the reduction of crop surpluses that were a cause of farmer's economic ruin. But beyond a few other measures, there's not much else to his presidency. He did not even end Prohibiton for example.
FDR on the other hand, gave a lot more power to the state. He implemented a series of reforms known as the New Deal, with the aim of ending the Great Depression. He also ended Prohibition, and led the country during World War II.
In general terms, most historians coincide that Roosevelt was a much better president than Herbert Hoover.
They thought they were doing the right thing and they shouldn’t blame Germany they should blame Adolf hitler
Answer:
The roots of the carnage can be tied to European colonialism in Rwanda. Through racist ideologies that led to a distinct classification of Hutu and Tutsi and a falsified history of Rwanda, Europeans successfully birthed an ethnic divide that ultimately led to the Rwandan Genocide
Answer:
Any male citizen had the right to vote, but voting was done in the city of Athens. Any male citizen had the right to sit on a jury and perform a public office. Apart from females, slaves were also not considered.
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
the political boundaries were created at the end of the second world war
