Francesco Redi performed his experiment against the theory of spontaneous generation. In his experiment, he takes one glass jar and a piece of flesh and analyzes them in three different situations.
<h3>Why did Francesco Redi perform his glass jar experiment?</h3>
Francesco Redi performed his glass jar experiment in order to illustrate the evidence against the theory of spontaneous generation.
He demonstrate that dead maggots or flies would not generate new flies when positioned on rotting flesh in a sealed jar, whereas live maggots or flies would have the capability to grow some eggs of maggots.
This experiment discredited both the presence of some essential components in once-living organisms and the requirement of fresh air to induce living life.
The complete question is as follows:
Which choice best summarizes the outcome of Redi‘s experiment?
- Evidence for the theory of spontaneous generation.
- Evidence against the theory of spontaneous generation.
- Evidence for the theory of special creation.
- Evidence for the theory of the origin of life.
Therefore, the correct option is B, i.e. Evidence against the theory of spontaneous generation.
To learn more about Francesco Redi's experiment, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/2776384
#SPJ1
Answer:
Secondary
Explanation:
There are several levels of prevention. You might confuse this with primary prevention. Primary prevention is preventing infection, so it has to be done before the patient caught the disease.
The needle-exchange program aims to reduce the spread of blood-borne disease(HIV, hepatitis, etc) from the multiple usages of the same needle. Since the disease already exists, this will be secondary prevention.
Answer: I am confused maybe add some choices next time please and thank you
Explanation:
The law of motion which is being described in this scenario is NEWTON THIRD LAW OF MOTION.
Newton third law of motion states that to every action there is an opposite and equal reaction.
