1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BartSMP [9]
4 years ago
12

Durkheim argues that crime is what in society? A. Preventable B. Immoral C. Avoidable D. Inevitable

History
1 answer:
yKpoI14uk [10]4 years ago
4 0

Durkheim argues that crime is Inevitable

Explanation:

  • In The Rules of Sociological Method Durkheim  introduces us into the realm of deviance. He believes that crime is a normal and inevitable phenomenon, as crimes occur in all societies so far, and are most prevalent in developed countries.
  • Durkheim believes that not all people are equally committed to common moral norms and social values. Each of us is exposed to different social influences and it is not possible to achieve complete social equality.
  • Durkheim imagines a society of saints, made up of perfect individuals, in which there would be no crime or robbery, in which care would be taken to avoid social transgression, and proves that such a society is impossible because in such a society the most trivial rule violations would become grave crimes.

Learn more on Durkheim on

brainly.com/question/5747901

brainly.com/question/7657612

brainly.com/question/8469269

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
What statement is true of working women in the early 1900s?
Hatshy [7]

Answer: D

Explanation: It was thought that women were inferior to men so they were not paid as much.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the war start and how did it end?
Alexandra [31]

The immediate cause for World War 1 was the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his pregnant wife Sophie. Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was the nephew of Emperor Franz Josef and heir to the throne of Austria and Hungary.
6 0
3 years ago
Which advantages did the British have over the colonists during the American war for independence? A. They were battling on thei
spayn [35]

The answer is d I hope that helps.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Connecticut Compromise in the Philadelphia Convention lead to the acceptance of the Constitution?
fiasKO [112]

Answer:  a) It allowed each state to choose its delegates for the Senate, which established equal representation among the states.

Further details:

The Connecticut Compromise was a measure decided during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  Also known as "The Great Compromise," it resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.   It was important because it created a two-chamber legislature, with proportional representation in the House and equal representation for all states in the Senate.

The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. (This was the essence of the Virginia Plan.) The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  (This was the New Jersey Plan.)

The Great Compromise (aka Connecticut Compromise) created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature, with different rules for representation in each chamber. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.

3 0
3 years ago
What circumstance led to Mark being outside of Paul's favor? How do we know this problem was resolved? Include scripture referen
Tamiku [17]

You can check in Acts 13:5 that John, or Mark, was accompanying Paul and Barnabas. John eventually left them though, as it can be seen in Acts 13:13.

<em>"From Paphos, Paul and his companions sailed to Perga in Pamphylia, where John left them to return to Jerusalem" </em>

When Paul and Barnabas planned another trip, Barnabas wanted John to accompany them, but Paul refused. He did not want someone who left them. Because of that, they went separated ways. Paul went with Silas, Barnabas with Mark.

When Paul wrote a epistle to the Colossians, he included a commendation of Mark in (as you can see in Colossians 4:10). It most likely means that the earlier contention was eventually resolved.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the main idea Thomas Paine was conveying in this exerpt
    9·1 answer
  • Alexander founded the city of Alexandria in the country of ______.
    10·2 answers
  • What is the majority rule?
    12·2 answers
  • What will happen if the ancient Chinese didn't invent the compass?
    12·2 answers
  • What advantages do the government have by raising taxes
    12·1 answer
  • Going from east to west on route 66, what states did the dust bowl migrants pass through?
    15·2 answers
  • Which group in hawaii was in favor of annexation by the united states ?
    10·2 answers
  • Federal government help to the states to deal with a hurricane is an example of which Constitutional principle?​
    12·1 answer
  • Use the word qualm in a sentence!!
    7·1 answer
  • What role did the south African women play against violation of human rights from 1950s to 1960s​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!