Answer:
Mass context.
Explanation:
In communication, the type of context that involves two or more people and that permits the least opportunity for feedback is called mass context. That is the context in which Paul is inserted. Notice that he cannot voice his opinions to the person who is talking on TV. There is no opportunity for feedback in this context. Even if Paul does express his thoughts to someone else, it won't be to the person he would like to address. Therefore, we can safely say the mass context is what is causing Paul’s frustration and anger.
The answer would be for some specialized nonprofit agencies, the mission is to reach a particular group of people in need. Because it’s not really talking about the overview of the shoe agency.
Informational/factual/historical. It might be any of these, if there is a multiple choice, send that that before putting that as your answer.
I think this means people feel great after accomplishments!
Sorry, I'm late! I HOPE THIS HELPS!
<em>Corroboration </em>is the evidence that is backed up by the initial evidence. For example, a witness says that I saw a man in black coat entering the store and buying a bag. Later, the saleswoman, who is another witness testifies that she sold the bag to the man in a black coat. In this case, both witnesses confirm the situation and the evidences coincide. When there is no corroboration, there is not any available source to confirm the same information.
