The idea of the social contract theory comes from Jean Jacques Rousseau's book the Social Contract but one of the most prominent philosophers that discussed the idea was Thomas Hobbes who describes social contract as a contract between the individuals and the government, whose authority comes from the people. The people would cede some of their rights to the government for protection and the sovereign is bound by the wishes of the people as it is they that govern his decisions.
So the question of John Stuart Mill relate to the theory of the social contract very much. The main issue is exactly how many rights would the people have to cede and what would be the right balance between the independence and the obedience to the social contract. That is a very thin and tricky line to navigate.
The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
Probably the same. or humanity will be gone or just a few poeple on earth. who know lol
The correct answer is:
A violent or destructive protest
According to the law of rights, everyone is allowed to join a protest but in a peaceful manner. In case, the protest leads to extremism, then the government is authorized to take necessary actions, with the help of law enforcement officials, in order to control the situation. And hence the protestors can be arrested and accused of violating the rule of laws.
Hope this helps!!
