Answer: It comes down to political opinion but in my personal opinion I think as corrupt and geared for one race it less power should be given to the gov and more to the people for each individual state. Lemme know what you think.
Throughout the history of the United States Congress there have been times when members of either chamber have refused to seat new members. Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution states that, "Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties as each House may provide." This means that members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate can refuse to recognize the election or appointment of a new representative or senator. They can bar the individual outright or refer the matter to a committee for inquiry. Powell v. McCormack (1969) clarified the issue of the scope of powers of the Congress to refuse to seat an elected member. The Federal Contested Elections Act of 1969 currently lays out the procedures by which each House determines contested elections.
I think that Athena is worried that Arachne will want revenge; and since spiders are basically Arachne's kids, Athena probably worries that Arachne and her kids will gang up on her. That's honestly the best I could come up with, hope it helps
Answer: The correct answer is C) Both political parties, and the public, agreed that it would help prevent future wars.
<em>Explanation: The League of nations sought support from both parties. </em>
Well, I'm not sure which war you're referencing. But, if it's WWI, they did it through war bonds and taxes. Mostly war bonds.
