While the majority of south asians work in Agriculture sector, the service sector makes up much of the GDP
many large corporations from developed country choose to outsource their services sector to south Asia
hope this helps
True because even if the producer is a foreign owned company its still would have got in
The benefits of immigration would be that when you are immigrated, you just got back to your assigned home town, and you get to live there like nothing were to happen, but as for a "province", I believe this would be when you get deported, you would be in assigned groups that they would put you in, in order to so certain things.
Explanation:
Cap carbonates overlie Neoproterozoic glacial rocks with or without having a sharp contact in between them. These cap carbonate rocks characterized by typical ripple like sedimentary structures are thought to be the result of the post glacial aftermath. It signifies a sharp transition of glacial deposits into meters or tens of meters thick. Most reliable hypothesis about its origin states that due to melting of a snow-ball earth a significant amount of carbon-di-oxide gets dissolved into water and forms carbonic acid that might have led to acid rain which might have attacked exposed silicates and carbonates and subsequently released calcium ( that might led to textured layers of carbonates i.e. so called carbonate caps when come in contact to the ocean). A school of scientists think that in a snowball earth condition a distinctive boundary might have been created between the oceanic and atmospheric Carbon dioxide reservoirs and sudden increase in carbon dioxide content in atmospheric reservoir led to deglaciation and melting and this made a pathway of the transportation of carbon dioxide from atmosphere to the ocean and resulted in carbonate precipitation. Again post-glacial up welling might bring out physical stratification and carbonate accumulation in the continental setting.
The work Pat Flynn and Tucker Smith co-authored was published in the Journal of Public Economics' August 2022 edition. Pat Flynn (PhD '22, now at Cornerstone Research) and Tucker Smith are both economics PhD candidates. "River, Lakes and Revenue Streams: The Heterogeneous Effects of Clean Water Act Grants on Local Spending" is the title of the research study.
- Grants of $167 billion (2020 dollars) were provided by the Clean Water Act (CWA) to local governments for the improvement of wastewater treatment. With a difference-in-differences methodology, we take advantage of heterogeneity in the date of grant receipt to calculate the impact of CWA payments on local expenditure. Sewerage capital expenditures rose by $0.45 on average for every dollar in grant money.
- When the benefit-to-cost ratios of CWA funds are divided by this estimate, it is projected that towns received an average return of $1.01 for every dollar they spent on sewage capital using CWA funding. The Act also established new capital criteria for all wastewater treatment plants in the US in addition to providing awards.
- We demonstrate that CWA grants increased sewerage capital spending dollar for dollar up to the amount required to pay for the expenses of newly mandated capital upgrades by the CWA, but after municipalities met these capital requirements or if the capital mandate was not legally binding, they decreased their own spending on sewerage capital in response to grant receipt. Municipalities subsequently reduced water prices for locals to disperse grant money.
Learn more about Heterogeneous Effects visit:brainly.com/question/8692576
#SPJ4
