I think it embodies strength or maybe ruthlessness. A sense of loss could be one, but that would be hard to explain
The main ideas shaping US imperialism were "Manifest destiny" and the "White man's burden". Manifest destiny refers to the 19th century belief that the United States were meant to expand across North America because of the particular excellence of its (white) people and (democratic) institutions. This lead to the Trail of Tears, among other atrocities. Once the US reached the Pacific Ocean, new lands came into view (Puerto Rico, the Phillipines). Manifest destiny became entwined with the idea that "civilized" nations had a moral obligation to colonize other peoples, which Rudyard Kipling summed up in his poem "White Man's Burden". The tensions in this "benevolent imperialism" were never fully resolved; the US invasion of Irak was launched under similar pretenses (the invasion was "for the good" of those invaded). The idea that other peoples have a right to self determination regardless of their level of development has not yet become accepted by the great powers, including the US.
Answer: It’s help other actors recognize their cue.
It’s D :)
The interpretation that most accurately describes the portrayal of men in each passage is D) in both cases women are presented as a been who is made the serve and obey, following their role as housewife and mother.
The other options are not correct because they present in either passage 1 or 2 a man who sees women as equal which is not possible according to the ideology of the characters in these stories.
