Answer:
Explanation:
if they are achivable yes try your hardest the harder they are to get the better it will feel once you acomplish it
B. Polite because if it is to unknown audience you dont want to become personal
Out of all given option, "Evan wanted nothing more than to cook for his friends and family", the sentence contains a particle.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
A particle refers the word which possesses grammatical functionality but would not match the main parts (i.e. adverb, verb and noun). The particles will not vary. For example, “To” an infinitive with verb as “to fly” is an example for particle, even it acts as a preposition, like "I am going to America next week."
Many words described as particles, e.g. Sayings such as "but" and "and", and pronunciations such as "oh" and "wow". Particles often occur when teaching phrasal verbs that can be grouped by particle for educational purposes, such as Off, On, and more. According to the above detail, concluding that sentence in option C would be the right answer.
Naturalist and Environmentalist, John Muir had a very romantic almost religious view of the nature. To Muir, the trees were divine and Americans had a moral and ethical duty to save them. He defined the redwoods as Christ-figures being crucified by men: <em>"Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot defend themselves or run away. And few destroyers of trees ever plant any; nor can planting avail much toward restoring our grand aboriginal giants. It took more than three thousand years to make some of the oldest of the Sequoias, trees that are still standing in perfect strength and beauty, waving and singing in the mighty forests of the Sierra. Through all the eventful centuries since Christ's time, and long before that, God has cared for these trees, saved them from drought, disease, avalanches, and a thousand storms; but he cannot save them from sawmills and fools; this is left to the American people." </em> He makes a connection between the reader and trees by personifying the trees and making them able to feel both joy and pain,<em>"Waving its branches for joy". </em>He also argues: <em>“Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot run away; and if they could, they would still be destroyed.” </em>
