Answer:
D is the answer.
Explanation:
The environment is not changing in any of these scenarios. Mark me Brainliest if you like my answer!
Answer:
The following group most likely would oppose to government intervention to improve the tenements: <u>(C) Protestant clergy who espoused the cause of social justice for the poor.</u>
Explanation:
The protestan clery group would oppose to the government intervention, because letting the government control would signify the danger of them controling the tenements. This would leave it all to the state and they were afraid it wouldn't actually be of any help.
The Reorganization Act allowed to president to hire confidential staff as he saw it fit, while also he was given the power to reorganize the executive branch of the government.
Hope it helps yah ... ｡◕‿◕｡
Answer:
The current Republican administration and the Republican-controlled Congress seem to support less government expenditure. Spokesman Ryan, as a rule, has shown a bias for fiscal discipline. President Trump went on a campaign that pledged government expenditure to save employment but did not generally deliver, and his position against the ACA showed a desire to reduce state action. It is also clear from the income cap that the state will get less revenue and that its expenditure and capacity to act will be lowered. Recent occurrences in Puerto Rico and the absence of complete assistance for the island represent less public action. <u>I think that this pattern will persist at least until the next Congressional elections.</u>
<u></u>
