Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is still the name of a person, therefore it is still required to be capitalized.
<span>It uses a respectful tone but needs specific, credible evidence to support the claim.
There is no credible evidence. The paragraph sounds more like the author is annoyed with the argument. While the author does call out parents and tells people they are using emotion to cloud their judgment, the author doesn't name call or shame anyone so I wouldn't say it uses a disrespectful tone.
</span>
<span>Emerson might advocate the benefits of consistency in the natural world. If one day, the grass was green, and the next, it was blue, Emerson might rethink his whole philosophy with hating conformity. Of course, it is good to be unique, but grass of a same species, should be uniform and stay the “right” color.</span>