1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
14

Why do historical interpretations change over time? Choose three answers. Evidence from the past is not credible or relevant. Pa

st discoveries are no longer important. New historical sites and sources are discovered. Computer technology allows historians to see things differently. A new historian asks different questions about past discoveries.
History
2 answers:
Anon25 [30]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the last 3

Explanation:

Basile [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The last three are right.

Explanation:

There is always more to the story.

You might be interested in
Explain how "muckraking" journalists influenced politicians in the early twentieth century
kumpel [21]

Explanation:

The muckrackers played a highly visible role during the early 20 th century, the Progressive Era. In summary, during the Progressive era, which lasted from around 1900 to 1917, muckrcking journalists successfully exposed America's problems brought on by rapid industrialization and growth of cities. Influential muckrackers created public awareness of corruption, social injustices and abuse of power.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was true about the chinese exclusion act?
Sauron [17]
The Chinese Exclusion Act<span>. In 1882, Congress passed the </span>Chinese Exclusion Act<span>, basically prohibiting any and all </span>Chinese<span> laborers from immigrating to the United States.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions
Sergio039 [100]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.

I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.

I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.

On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.

8 0
3 years ago
What policy is Wilson promoting about the war in Europe?
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer: I do not have the answer, but I have an app that will help you with the answer!

Explanation: Socratic :)

4 0
3 years ago
Where did the declaration of independence take place
arsen [322]

Answer:

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on July 4, 1776.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 9. What two nations emerged as superpowers after World War II?
    14·1 answer
  • When did world war 1 start
    8·2 answers
  • The framers of the Constitution intended to establish
    8·1 answer
  • KJKFDNVEh,negekejgWLKEGEW
    15·2 answers
  • This is a period during the 1920s when the national attitude was positive and upbeat, and Americans had money as the stock marke
    6·1 answer
  • French and Spanish explorers differed most in terms of their
    5·1 answer
  • What are effects of John Brown’s raid?<br><br> ASAP PLEASE
    15·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE IM UNDER A LOT OF STRESS
    7·1 answer
  • Why did people migrate from Asia to the Americas?
    15·1 answer
  • What are two purposes of government?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!