1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergiy2304 [10]
3 years ago
13

Select the TWO characteristics from the options below that show economic causes of the French Revolution.

History
1 answer:
zzz [600]3 years ago
3 0
The government overspending on their King caused them to go into major debt, which did not help them because they did not have no money for funding and this left them no other option but to go to war. The other reason was that they had no ideas. They were in contact with American philosophers and this caused for the spread of new ideas on the way that people should be treated, which also caused for the people to want to go to war. <span />
You might be interested in
Would a historian find the painting useful for information?
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

Would

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
The success of the South's economy did not depend on slave labor.truemor false​
Archy [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

True

6 0
3 years ago
Why was gerrymandering made illegal? What problems could result if this practice were used? Why does it make elections unfair an
Morgarella [4.7K]
Gerrymandering is a method by which the boundaries of council wards are moved to create the majority desired by the current authority. It was used widely in Northern Ireland by the loyalist authority during the 1920s-30s in order to keep the nationalists (who were generally Catholics) subdued, hence stopping them from gaining a political foothold which could have led to the destabalisation of the Northern Irish state.

I am not aware of it being expressly illegal (I study History GCSE, not government and politics), but I imagine such an action would be taken to make elections more fair, gaining equal representation of each sect within the population to allow equal civil rights for all. It would also make elections more competitive, preventing one political party from abusing their power to remain dominant in a country, despite public opinion as a whole.

It makes elections unfair because if there is a slight majority of supporters of party A in one part of a city (for example), the boundary of the electoral wards could be moved to subdivide it into minorities compared with supporters of party B in other areas of the city, whereas a whole this area would have easily voted-in a party-A representative.

I hope this helps, although it is quite a tricky concept to explain in detail.
3 0
4 years ago
How did buddhism overtake ancestral worship as the main religion in china?
yawa3891 [41]
The rulers of China didn't want other religions to be practiced, so everyone converted to buddhism
4 0
3 years ago
Why is food processing an important Midwestern industry?
mel-nik [20]

Answer: D

Explanation: Hope this helped!!!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do historians argue imperialism as a cause of WW1?
    6·1 answer
  • ASAP
    14·1 answer
  • Population growth is influenced by improvements in
    12·2 answers
  • 10.<br> What is vertical integration?
    8·2 answers
  • I will give the brainiest
    10·2 answers
  • How does the multiplicity of interests in american society protect the rights of its citizens answer?
    12·1 answer
  • What were the three states annexed by prussia
    13·1 answer
  • WHO WAS HENRY IL AND THOMAS BECKET?​
    6·1 answer
  • Benefits one leader has total control?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is this right tell me asap i need an answer for the teacher
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!