the foreign community through the Cohong
I hope that's help.
<span>That's an interesting question. Feudal Japan had a more formalized and ritualized kind of culture than feudal Europe did; elaborate rules of courtesy applied at all levels of society, whereas European peasants were pretty crude for the most part. In both societies there was a unifying religious principle, which in Europe was Christianity and the authority of the Church, and in Japan was shintoism and the authority of the Emperor. In both cases, a social hierarchy attempted, with considerable success, to control everyone's lives; everyone owed their fealty to someone, except for the kings in Europe or the Emperor in Japan, who didn't owe loyalty to anyone, since there was no higher authority (at least, not counting deities). Both societies had similar types of weaponry (European armor was considerably tougher) and skilled swordsmen were much to be feared and respected. In the lower classes, life was cheap. Neither society had any concept of human rights; only the nobility had rights.</span>
To measure the amount of human capital available in a country, it would be best to determine the literacy rate of that country.
<span>If you want to calculate the human capital of the country, the foremost thing you can do is to find the elements which are important in order to calculate the human capital. These elements include the number of people with higher education in a country, students, academics, research activity, the degree of utilization of potential labor resources, etc. Once the identification process is done, you have to select the variables which are quite related to the human capital, which includes the number of university students for 10,000 people, employment in Research and development per 1,000 economically active people.</span>
