I don't get the question, but if I had to guess what it'd have to be I'd say this statement is true. Many writers pushed boundaries, and experimented with what they were allowed to publish without restriction.
The appropriate pronoun that would complete the given sentence above is "me". The complete sentence would be: Mom taught Carrie and me to drive last summer. Why "me" and not "I". The missing pronoun is a direct object. It is the receiver of the action along with "Carrie". The pronoun "I" is a subject pronoun whereas, the pronoun "me" is a object pronoun.
They tend to lose their way
as it says they forget that they have even made a meal or even the name of their street
Answer:
How much the audience already knows about an event (option C)
Explanation:
For this question, it seems like the point of view and the knowledge of the audience are both important, and they are,
<em />
<em>but</em>, a newspaper should be unbiased/the point of view shouldn't really matter
so, one of the most important aspects is how much the audience already knows. This allows newspaper articles to give enough information that the newspaper is able to be read, but not so much redundancy to bore readers.
I was convicted of a crime and I was taken into a trial with a judge, jury and I was trying to justify the actions I partook in. I claimed that two witnesses at the event had committed perjury and I proposed a fair alibi. My road to justice had been blocked by the judicial decision to mark me as guilty. Their jurisdiction offended me, as they clearly had some racial bias that I was a victim to, I strongly believe that my trial was not just.
