Answer:
Reality TV is typically defined as, non-fictional programming in which portrayal is presumed to present current, historical events or circumstances. The production itself must be a realistic account. Generally included in this category are news and public affairs programming, interviews, talk shows, entertainment, or news programming, documentaries, real-world events, police or emergency worker drama, and live quiz shows. The regulation of broadcasting content poses a dilemma between the need for intervention in order to protect the interests of the public on the one hand and considerations for freedom of expression on the other hand. Policymakers justify intervention in broadcasting content, due to the significant level of influence that the media has over our lives. Barendt (1995) perceives broadcasting as an activity of enormous political and social significance, while Feintuck and Varney (2006) consider that our view of the world is influenced more by media than our personal experience. Furthermore, Varona (2004) points towards the unparalleled influence of broadcasting in shaping our culture, identity, and values. According to Varona, television at its best plays the role of educator and equalizer (due to its power to act as a bridge between people), while at its worst, television is littered with exploitative programming that does more to pollute than enrich our democracy and culture.
Explanation:
I think this is okay? I wasn't entirely sure what you wanted the paragraph to say regarding the regulation of reality TV.
Answer:
I believe it is D, hope i helped ^-^
Explanation:
Future progressive form is will be
so c.
Answer:
She shows women can do things too not only men
Explanation:
The evidence the author uses to support the false analogy is that college sports are just as important as bookstores.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The author uses a false relationship between university games and university bookstores.
- He uses this to show that students who work in bookstores receive salaries, but university players don't, but they are of equal importance.
- The evidence that the author shows to confirm this relationship is that college games are as important as bookstores.
- However, both the relationship and the evidence convey an incorrect idea.
Bookstores are part of the educational system that universities should promote, university games are not. In addition, many college athletes have scholarships, while students working in the campus do so for salaries or lower funding.
You can find more information about false analogy at the link:
brainly.com/question/1235960
