I believe the proper answer would be "Sentence 3".
Answer/Explanation
The Treaty of Versailles could have been improved in many ways. First, more countries could have helped pay for the damage, The treaty gave some German territories to neighboring countries and placed other German territories. It would have been a more settled argument if they used the 14 points which were general and not bias.
(How would change it to make it better)
First, more countries could have helped pay for the damage because all of the countries took part in this war. This also could have been improved because the treaty of Versailles only blamed one country.
Semi colon because after it says humans it is contradicting itself by saying the opposite. Hope it helps
Answer: A 2014 Supreme Court decision regarding newspaper censorship
Explanation:
It should be noted that the original source of information which are called the primary source include autobiography, artifact, document, recordings etc. which are created during the period under study.
Regarding the options given, a 2014 Supreme Court decision regarding newspaper censorship is the most credible one to use in an article about limits on freedom of speech in the United States. It gives a true and original description of the topic at hand.
On the other hand, a blog post, a video
podtbon social media or newspaper column advocating limits on free speech doesn't give the original information source as the content could have been manipulated.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
