1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BaLLatris [955]
3 years ago
6

When it first entered World War II, why did the United States commit seventy percent of its resources to the war in Europe?

History
1 answer:
prisoha [69]3 years ago
7 0
<span>Roosevelt believed Hitler and Germany were the more dangerous enemy and so had to be defeated first.

Hope this helps! :)</span>
You might be interested in
What was the result of the East-West Schism?
IgorC [24]
"The Great Schism of 1054" / "East to West Schism" was the final​ speration of the eastern and western churches. (Protestant vs. Catholic) People broke away from the Catholic church for the first time NOT afraid of consequence.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has Nevada economy changed over the past 100 years?
Ad libitum [116K]
At the beginning of the 20th century, Nevada was struggling with a 20-year depression. When the veins of gold, silver and copper dried up, the mining industry closed and people left Nevada. There were so few people left it hardly qualified to be called a state. In March 1931, Nevada legalized gambling in their desperate move to raise revenues. Also in that month, construction of the Hoover Dam began. This sure and steady supply of water and cheap electricity sent flocks of people back to Nevada. With the advent of World War II, the United States built their military bases in the West and Southern Nevada was a suitable venue. 1,000 homes were built by the federal government to house a workforce of 10,000 for a magnesium processing plant. After the war, resort hotels began to crop up across the Southern Nevadan desert. The interstate system made travelling to Nevada easy. After the creation of the Nevada Gaming Commission, the state started to attract legitimate investors. Nevada was one of the greatest economic success stories in the 20th century. 
7 0
3 years ago
Which statement describes a major difference between the international
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

D. Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces, but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not

Explanation:

The genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda are part of the numerous genocides that took place in the past several decades. The genocide in Bosnia was initiated by Serbian nationalist, and it was toward the Muslims and the Croatians. The international community did reacted though to stop it, and sent its military forces in order to put things under control. The genocide in Rwanda though took another course. The Hutu started to perform genocide over the Tutsi minority, but the international community was hesitating should it react or not, if it does in which way, and while it was thinking the genocide was going on and on. Luckily for the Tutsi people, they had their own military forces that were well equipped, so they managed to stop the aggression form the Hutu before they made a full scale genocide.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Fracasos de Ignacio allende en la independencia?
malfutka [58]
No espanol holmes but my ppls gone getchu right
6 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt from Robert Yates’s notes from the Constitutional Convention on June 11, 1787. Mr. Wilson was of opinion, and t
beks73 [17]

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise established that a state’s enslaved population would be counted for partial representation.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement made between delegates during the Constitutional Convention (1787) that established that the number of seats in the House of Representatives for each state should be calculated in accordance to the number of free persons (excluding Indians not taxed) and the three-fifths of slaves in every state. In other words, the Compromise counted three out of every five slaves as people for partial representation. This agreement would increase the power of slave states.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why were the smaller states in favor of the New Jersey Plan?
    6·1 answer
  • If someone is a "nativist," who is he or she against? A. Americans B. Only American Indians C. Only eastern Europeans D. New imm
    6·2 answers
  • United states about 2.5% of the land is floodplain and home to about __________ of the population.
    10·1 answer
  • Summarize the precedent of "judicial review," which was established in the case of Marbury v. Madison.
    10·1 answer
  • Labor Unions in the 1800s were successful in achieving their goals.<br> A) True<br> B) False
    11·1 answer
  • What best describes Andrew Jackson’s presidency?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following towns was established prior to Texas becoming its own republic?
    8·2 answers
  • In which year was Nelson Mandela released from prison?
    13·2 answers
  • What did the US government offer in exchange for ceded land during the Medicine Lodge Council?
    12·2 answers
  • Correct the sentences below.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!