I know it's late, but it's Eve.
They fought for home and had a home-field advantage. They also had knowledge of the area. They had the french on their side.
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
The hills provided a safe place for the Americans to gather to plan rebellion.
Explanation:
The most important thing about the mantaining the control of the hills is the fact that you can see and oberve everything around and hold positions, they didn´t have the opportunity nor the arms to attack the british troops in the harbor, but at that time it provided a great and safe place for the Americans to gather to plan rebellion.
Answer: Op-Ed : aims to persuade, expresses opinion, uses loaded language
News Article : aims to inform, uses neutral language, reports facts
Explanation:
