Answer:
(Hope this helps can I pls have brainlist (crown)☺️)
Explanation:
When two laws appear to contradict one another, it is the duty and obligation of the courts to determine which law should be applied. This is especially true if the statute in question is in violation of the Constitution of the United States.
The correct answer is folksy and likeable. Ronald Reagan was President of the United States. He became an iconic figure to which Republican candidates for the next generation often praised. Ronald Reagan was convivial, upbeat, courteous, respectful, self-confident, and humble. But he was also opaque, remote, distant, and inscrutable. He was a larger-than-life character, a formidable politician, and an important president.
Answer:
A criticism of the judicial branch is that it has less of a check and balance than the other two branches in the sense that when it declares something as unconstitutional, the other two branches cannot veto or undo this decision. Basically, it has the power to make any law or decision unconstitutional without a check on that power. I disagree with this because the judicial branch has not declared anything unreasonably unconstitutional and they mostly use this power in ways that help the country as a whole
Explanation:
I believe the answer may be D. In taking action, one must not worry about success or failure.
<u>Answer:</u>
Of an object rolling down an inclined plane, the potential energy decreases as the kinetic energy increases.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- An object that is located at a certain height is constantly being pulled down by the gravitational force of the planet.
- Thus, the potential of an object to come back to the ground when suspended freely is referred to as potential energy possessed by the object.
- When a spherical object is set free on an inclined plane, it automatically gains motion.
- As long as the object continues to roll down the inclination, it is said to have kinetic energy.
