The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Answer:
O sectionalism was reduced.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is: They formed the Women's Peace Party
Explanation:
The American women demonstrated their opposition to<em> World War I </em>by forming the <em>Women's Peace Party (WPP).</em> This organization was established by Jane Addams,<em> an American social worker and activist.</em>
The members of this organization believed that "<em>women were the mother half of humanity"</em> and thus, they needed to do something to stop the war. They called for<em> arm control and its limitation,</em> <em>managing European conflict and striving to remove the causes of war (particularly, economic).</em>
Thus, this explains the answer.
For Plato users the answer is A. "to make them less expensive to build."
I hope this helped!(:
The states population and that slaves would count as 3/5ths a person
