Answer:
Mickey's type of thinking is C. Egocentric.
Explanation:
According to Piaget, Mickey is the the Preoperational Stage of the <em>Stages of Cognitive Development.</em> This stage goes from 2- 7 years of age and, as the name states, occurs when the child is about to form an operational thinking.
A central point of this stage is egocentrism which refers to the <em>inability</em><em> to see outside one's point of view. </em>A child during this stage drives him/ herself by imitating others and playing but he/she believes <em>everyone sees the world through his/her eyes.</em> For this child, the idea of a different point of view is impossible.
In this case, Mickey thought the frog was cool and since he was egocentric, he thought his <em>mother would also think the frog was cool.</em> It did not occur to Mickey that his mother could have a different opinion from his own or that she would not find it cool.
Answer:
Become an active volunteer of find other ways to remain socially engaged, is the right answer.
Explanation:
An individual who actively participates (without any payment) in the tasks of an organization or institute to achieve the goals of the organization is known as a volunteer. The volunteers are generally found in the NGOs or the charitable trusts.
They try to work for the welfare of the people associated with their group or organization. According to the given question, Xavier is a person who shared strong community connections with people throughout his adulthood and was an active volunteer. Due to this, he is more likely to become an active volunteer to find other ways to remain socially engaged.
Answer; yes
Ps hope this helps you
Explanation:
It’s hard to imagine a political institution less suited to a 21st-century liberal democracy than the Electoral College. It arose from a convoluted compromise hammered out late in the Constitutional Convention, and the rise of political parties in the late 18th century and the spread of democratic ideals in the early 19th quickly undermined its rationales. If it didn’t exist, no one today would consider creating it.
But the Electoral College is worse than merely useless. Its primary function is to malapportion political power, and it does so — indeed, has always done so — with strikingly awful consequences. A state is entitled to a number of electors equal to its number of senators and representatives. Before the Civil War, the combination of the Electoral College and the Three-Fifths Clause, counting a slave as three-fifths of a person, gave the Slave Power outsize control in electing the president, with the consequence that antebellum presidents were almost always either slaveholders or at least friendly to their interests (the major exceptions were both named Adams). After the war, every person counted as a full person for apportionment purposes — but with the collapse of Reconstruction and the violent disfranchisement of African-Americans throughout the South, that increase in representation once again redounded only to the benefit of white male power-holders, a situation that was not largely rectified until the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Because a state’s number of electors is based on total population, not actual voters, it gives the states no incentive to enfranchise new groups of people, or to make voting easier for those eligible. And because states want to maximize their influence in selecting the president, they also have a strong incentive to use a winner-take-all approach to awarding electors, which all but two states currently do. The result — as we’ve now seen twice in the last two decades — is that a popular vote loser can be an Electoral College winner.
In a liberal democracy, not everything need be decided by majority vote. But once something is put to a vote, it is hard to understand why the side getting fewer votes should win. And Americans have long understood themselves to be voting for their president, not for presidential electors. It is long past time to get rid of the Electoral College.
by jese wingman
The correct answer is PTSD or also known as posttraumatic
stress disorder. This is defined as a disorder by which people have experienced
a shocking or dangerous event that makes the individual to naturally feel
afraid after experiencing the traumatic situation.