diocletian and constantine were considered ineffective rulers, and both left the roman empire in an even weaker state by the end

Question

marishachu [46]

3 years ago

10

diocletian and constantine were considered ineffective rulers, and both left the roman empire in an even weaker state by the end

of their rules, ultimately making it possible for invaders to destroy rome. true or false?

History

2 answers:

leva [86] · Answer 1 · 2022-03-24T12:27:27+03:00

Answer:

The correct answer is: FALSE.

Explanation:

Both of these Emperors were very effective rulers that improved their Empire fiscally, administratively, militarily and culturaly.

Diocletian was the emperor who restored an efficient government to the empire after the near anarchy of the 3rd century. He reorganized the empire, laid the foundation for the Byzantine Empire in the East and strenghten the decaying empire in the West.

Constantine introduced Christianity to the Roman Empire. This new Christian culture lead to the growth of Byzantine and Western medieval culture.

JulijaS [17] · Answer 2 · 2022-03-24T10:07:25+03:00

JulijaS [17]3 years ago

5 0

The answer is true. hope it help