1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zielflug [23.3K]
3 years ago
14

According to Jared Diamond, Europeans were less likely to contract fatal

History
2 answers:
Crank3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Jared Diamond: As Europeans expanded around the world, they conquered other people, ... Because the Cape and Europe lie at a similar latitude, or distance from the ... The Europeans were able to establish prosperous farms and settlements, ... Voiceover: But settlers like the Du Toit knew that this was not an empty land.

Explanation:

Jared Diamond: As Europeans expanded around the world, they conquered other people, ... Because the Cape and Europe lie at a similar latitude, or distance from the ... The Europeans were able to establish prosperous farms and settlements, ... Voiceover: But settlers like the Du Toit knew that this was not an empty land.

aev [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

168 Spaniards attacked the imperial army of the Incas in the highlands of Peru. Before the day was out, they had massacred 7,000 people, and taken control of the Inca Empire. Not a single Spanish life was lost in the process. Why was the balance of power so uneven between Old World and New? And why, in the centuries that followed, were Europeans the ones who conquered so much of the globe? These are questions that fascinate Professor Jared Diamond. He is on a quest to understand the roots of power, searching for clues in the most unlikely places. He’s developed a highly original theory that what separates the winners from the losers is the land itself – geography. It was the shape of the continents, their crops and animals that allowed some cultures to flourish while others were left behind. But can this way of seeing the world shed light on the events of 1532? How can geography explain the conquest of the world by

guns, germs and steel?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast the Watergate Scandal with the Iran-Contra Affair. Do you think both Presidents Reagan and Nixon were invol
Ne4ueva [31]

The Watergate scandal involved the break-in by the Republicans into the Democratic National Convention headquarters at the Watergate Hotel in Washington, DC in 1972. This criminal activity became a constitutional crisis because the Nixon administration attempted to cover-up the event. In the course of investigating the break-in, numerous abuses were uncovered by journalists  (Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein at the <em>Washington Post</em>)and investigators. The arrest of the five burglars and subsequent investigations by the FBI found a link between the burglars and the Pre-Election Campaign Fund for Richard Nixon. An investigation of former Nixon staff, revealed an elaborate tape recording system in the Oval Office. Once the courts ordered the release of the tapes, it was clear they implicated Nixon in the break-in. Rather than face impeachment, Nixon resigned before Articles of Impeachment could be voted on in the U.S. House of Representatives. This scandal tarnished the presidency and exposed fundamental flaws in Nixon's character and decision making abilities.

Unlike Watergate, the Iran-Contra Scandal involved the selling of arms to Iran and the proceeds from those sales being funneled to the Contras in Nicaragua who were fighting the Sandinistas.  These activities were spearheaded by members of the Reagan administration during his second  administration (1984-1988). Initially, the administration argued the funds were being used to free American hostages held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, an Islamic terrorist group. In 1985, Colonel Oliver North was implicated in diverting money to the to the Contras. The scandal was investigated by the U.S. Congress and the Tower Commission, a three person appointed by Reagan. The investigation never implicated Ronald Reagan.

The Watergate scandal was clearly the more damaging. It weakened Americans faith in the presidency and led to the resignation of Richard Nixon.

6 0
3 years ago
Question 8
lana [24]
Source found using beacon
7 0
1 year ago
Por que los egipcios dividieron sus etapas en Imperio Antiguo, Medio y Nuevo?
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

porque sus creencias y leyes del antiguo cambiaronpor otra mas aceptable

6 0
3 years ago
What did hydroelectric power do for the American West?
valkas [14]
Provided affordable power that allowed the west to develop more rapidly
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The rococo style was influenced by the
nalin [4]
<span><span> </span>Catholic Church's religious austerity.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How would you characterize the Carter administrations foreign policy?
    5·1 answer
  • The Battle of Midway was significant in World War II because it marked the end of
    5·1 answer
  • What was the US focused on in Haiti starting in 1915? Check all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • The direct goal of most of President Calvin Coolidge’s policies was limiting ____________ and supporting business.
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the role of loyalists during the war?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT one of the economic systems introduced during and after the Industrial Revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • During the Renaissance, the position of the Italian peninsula near the Eastern Mediterranean encouraged trade with
    14·1 answer
  • Email. of political situation of nepal​
    8·1 answer
  • 9. Why was World War I called the Great War?
    5·1 answer
  • Which actions are a part of a citizen’s responsibility to participate in government?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!