Feudalism was an oppressive government system; once you were born into a class, you stayed there. There was very little social mobility, so it’s quite apparent to see why only the royals and nobles would benefit from such.
One of the main differences of interpretation between Charles Beard and Carol Berkin is their point of view on the Constitution and the founding fathers.
Charles Beard is the author of An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. In this work published in 1913, the author argued that the Constitution of the United States was formulated to serve the interests of wealthy members of the upper class of society.
One of his most controversial statements is his claim about the Founding Fathers, whom he points out as belonging to the upper-class group and who wrote the Constitution to defend their rights and interests.
On the other hand, Carol Berkin is the author of the book The Bill of Rights: The Fight to Secure America's Liberties, published in 2015. In this book, she exposes her interpretation of the process of creation of the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights.
Her interpretation of these historical events is framed in a vision of the founding fathers as mere mortals who ignored the possibility that the new government they were building would last for many years.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that Carol Berkin and Charles Beard have different views of the Constitution and the founding fathers such as:
- Charles considers that they wrote the constitution for their convenience.
- Carol describes them as ordinary people who wanted to change their situation and establish a government for all.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1992478
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
Point 1- Avoiding french future hostility encompassing it with more grounded nations (ie-Switzerland perceived as an autonomous country).
Point 2- Reestablish a parity of intensity so no nation danger to each other.
Point 3-Wanted to reestablish European imperial families to the honored positions they had held before Napoleon's victories.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
After the Napoleonic Wars, focal Europe as often as possible saw essential discretionary exchanges, and urban communities, for example, Vienna, Aix-la-Chapelle, Carlsbad, Troppau, and Laibach filled in as the spots for meet of European rulers and negotiators. Austrian Chancellor Clemens Wenzel Lothar Nepomuk Prince von Metternich-Winneburg assumed a main job at these gatherings somewhere in the range of 1814 and 1822, and he especially needed them to occur in the regions of the Austrian Empire since he could in this manner better control their course and apply impact over the occasions to a degree without a doubt surpassing the genuine intensity of the express whose intrigues he upheld.
When writing this letter, you should include the fact that although regulations were limited and there were frequent worker injuries, productivity was high in the factory, which led to increased output and subsequently increased GDP for the state and country.
