1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faltersainse [42]
3 years ago
6

Read the claim. Children should avoid playing violent video games that could have a negative influence; instead, they should pla

y nonviolent games, of which there are thousands available. Read the counterclaim. Because there is no proven link between violence in video games and real-life violence, children should, with adult supervision, be given the opportunity to play any video games they choose. Read the rebuttal. While the proof of a link is debatable, what is not debatable is the foolishness of allowing children to choose whatever video game they would like, since it empowers children unnecessarily. Which statement best analyzes the rebuttal? It is effective because it uses fair and unbiased logic to present a flaw in the counterclaim. It is effective because it sets an authoritative tone incorporating strong reasoning. It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim. It is ineffective because it does not acknowledge any part of the counterclaim.
English
2 answers:
VLD [36.1K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C. It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Explanation:

A claim is a statement that expresses the position of someone towards some situation or subject, in this case, this position is about just letting children play non-violent video games as the violent ones could have a negative influence. On the other hand, a counterclaim is an argument that aims at disproving or showing the main claim is not true, in this case, the counterclaim states there is not a link between violence in videogames and real violence which means the violence in videogames does not lead to violence in real life.

Additionally, a rebuttal is provided, which is an argument against the counterclaim by the author of the claim, similar to the counterclaim the rebuttal aims at disproving the opinion from the opposition and because of this the rebuttal should show there is a link between real violence and videogame violence or some other factor in videogames that leads to real violence. However, the rebuttal presented only mentions that allowing children to choose video games would empower them which is not related to the issue of violence discussed. Because of this, this rebuttal does not disprove the counterclaim or provide some logical reason to show the counterclaim is false and therefore is ineffective. Thus, it can be said the rebuttal is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Vesna [10]3 years ago
3 0

It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

You might be interested in
What should be the FIRST step when making an outline?
sasho [114]

Answer:

Decide on the main point to address in your outline.

Explanation:

Usually when making an outline you would make your thesis statement first, however since thesis statement is not there the closest thing to a these statement is the main point to address in your outline.

Also when doing process of elimination anything that has to do with evidence comes second or when it comes to secondary info.

Hope that this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Plz helppp <br> look photo<br> plzz i will give brainliest
slava [35]

1.a. he had only been playing

b. they had played

2.a. he had drank

b. he had been drinking

3.a. she had not been looking

7 0
2 years ago
My favorite thing to do is play volleyball and drink coffee and tea. The reason why my favorite sport is volleyball is because i
telo118 [61]

THE ANSWER: narrative

5 0
3 years ago
I want to learn English ​
Harlamova29_29 [7]
Alright that’s awesome :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the effect of Eris' placement of the golden apple on the table during a complicating incident in "The Judgment of Paris"
Inessa [10]

Answer:

The answer is D) It starts a chain of events that ultimately leads to war.

Explanation:

Just took the test :D

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How is cotton and robin alike?
    15·1 answer
  • How does Fortunato advance the plot of “The Cask of Amontillado”?
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
    10·1 answer
  • 1) _____ is the process by which an author reveals characters in a story and brings them to life.
    15·2 answers
  • Can someone please change the passive voice into active voice? URGENT
    10·1 answer
  • If you read a speech by an individual in a book of great speeches published 75 years later, what date for the primary source (th
    8·1 answer
  • What weird food combinations do you really enjoy?
    5·2 answers
  • Essential question: how do we remember the past? what has the play taught you about how we remember the past?
    6·1 answer
  • Is it good to use animals to earn a livelihood
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think Elijah’s attitude toward Devon has changed?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!