1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faltersainse [42]
3 years ago
6

Read the claim. Children should avoid playing violent video games that could have a negative influence; instead, they should pla

y nonviolent games, of which there are thousands available. Read the counterclaim. Because there is no proven link between violence in video games and real-life violence, children should, with adult supervision, be given the opportunity to play any video games they choose. Read the rebuttal. While the proof of a link is debatable, what is not debatable is the foolishness of allowing children to choose whatever video game they would like, since it empowers children unnecessarily. Which statement best analyzes the rebuttal? It is effective because it uses fair and unbiased logic to present a flaw in the counterclaim. It is effective because it sets an authoritative tone incorporating strong reasoning. It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim. It is ineffective because it does not acknowledge any part of the counterclaim.
English
2 answers:
VLD [36.1K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C. It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Explanation:

A claim is a statement that expresses the position of someone towards some situation or subject, in this case, this position is about just letting children play non-violent video games as the violent ones could have a negative influence. On the other hand, a counterclaim is an argument that aims at disproving or showing the main claim is not true, in this case, the counterclaim states there is not a link between violence in videogames and real violence which means the violence in videogames does not lead to violence in real life.

Additionally, a rebuttal is provided, which is an argument against the counterclaim by the author of the claim, similar to the counterclaim the rebuttal aims at disproving the opinion from the opposition and because of this the rebuttal should show there is a link between real violence and videogame violence or some other factor in videogames that leads to real violence. However, the rebuttal presented only mentions that allowing children to choose video games would empower them which is not related to the issue of violence discussed. Because of this, this rebuttal does not disprove the counterclaim or provide some logical reason to show the counterclaim is false and therefore is ineffective. Thus, it can be said the rebuttal is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Vesna [10]3 years ago
3 0

It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

You might be interested in
Choose an antonym for the word fallacy. A.​
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

Truth

Explanation:

There is a whole long list

3 0
3 years ago
When a government fails to protect the unalienable rights of its citizens, it is the duty and right of citizens to create anothe
dimaraw [331]
This is part of the natural rights in the preamble.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. Which literary form is a record of the writer's personal life experiences?
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

memoir

Explanation:

Took the test

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. In one of the opening scenes, we see Amir and Hassan returning home from a
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

Amir has a rich background while Hassan has a poor background.

Explanation:

The descriptions of Amir's possessions are those of a person who is rich. He has a magnificent house and he has a red brick driveway which also suggests that he also owns cars. This implies that he must be rich or that he must come from a rich family because it is only a rich person that can afford to own these things.

Hassan on the other walks towards a little mud hut which also implies that he must come from a poor and humble background.

7 0
2 years ago
Identify where the following sentence is a complete, correct sentence as is, or choose which boundary error is present in the se
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

A.......................

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Choose the pair of words that best completes this analogy: prescription : physician :: remedy : medicine agriculture : farmer pe
    9·2 answers
  • 50 POINTS!!!
    5·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from "The Lottery." "They do say," Mr. Adams said to Old Man Warner, who stood next to him, "that over in the n
    6·2 answers
  • the first time dickson leaves the secret garden, he leaves mary a picture of a missle thrush. which best explains dickson motiva
    11·2 answers
  • What does no man is above the law and no man is below it: nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it.mean?
    11·1 answer
  • What does this exchange reveal about the relationship between Edna and Arobin?
    8·1 answer
  • Based on what you've learned about time management, which of these statements is true?
    14·1 answer
  • Where in the refrigerator should you store raw meat
    10·2 answers
  • What is meaning of proud? ¿ follow for more. answer the question​
    7·1 answer
  • so... i lost my moms cat and she loves the cat more than me and he ran out the back door what do i do if i tell her imma get tol
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!