1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faltersainse [42]
3 years ago
6

Read the claim. Children should avoid playing violent video games that could have a negative influence; instead, they should pla

y nonviolent games, of which there are thousands available. Read the counterclaim. Because there is no proven link between violence in video games and real-life violence, children should, with adult supervision, be given the opportunity to play any video games they choose. Read the rebuttal. While the proof of a link is debatable, what is not debatable is the foolishness of allowing children to choose whatever video game they would like, since it empowers children unnecessarily. Which statement best analyzes the rebuttal? It is effective because it uses fair and unbiased logic to present a flaw in the counterclaim. It is effective because it sets an authoritative tone incorporating strong reasoning. It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim. It is ineffective because it does not acknowledge any part of the counterclaim.
English
2 answers:
VLD [36.1K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C. It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Explanation:

A claim is a statement that expresses the position of someone towards some situation or subject, in this case, this position is about just letting children play non-violent video games as the violent ones could have a negative influence. On the other hand, a counterclaim is an argument that aims at disproving or showing the main claim is not true, in this case, the counterclaim states there is not a link between violence in videogames and real violence which means the violence in videogames does not lead to violence in real life.

Additionally, a rebuttal is provided, which is an argument against the counterclaim by the author of the claim, similar to the counterclaim the rebuttal aims at disproving the opinion from the opposition and because of this the rebuttal should show there is a link between real violence and videogame violence or some other factor in videogames that leads to real violence. However, the rebuttal presented only mentions that allowing children to choose video games would empower them which is not related to the issue of violence discussed. Because of this, this rebuttal does not disprove the counterclaim or provide some logical reason to show the counterclaim is false and therefore is ineffective. Thus, it can be said the rebuttal is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Vesna [10]3 years ago
3 0

It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

You might be interested in
6. In Scene 6, Friar Laurence urges Romeo to be cautious. Given what you know
olasank [31]

Answer:

Yup I’ll just be a good person and I’ll give you the best pick of me and I can do anything to you make sure I

Explanation:

For the first true reason I’m gonna I was gonna I wanna was the time the day we were

7 0
3 years ago
Which character in The Great Gatsby would you most like to invite to dinner? Why?
SpyIntel [72]
This is really an opinion thing. But say Jay Gatsby, because he knows how to have a fun time.
7 0
3 years ago
Which is an example of rising action in the metamorphosis
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

When Gregor’s family is disgusted with his new form

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
How does the author use paragraphs 30-31 to refine their ideas? Cite evidence in your answer.
Gnoma [55]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The author use paragraphs 30-31 to refine their ideas in the following way.

When Thomas Jefferson, who drafted the Declaration of Independence, wrote <em>"In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress..." </em>he wants to conclude that American colonists have tried many ways to get a proper answer from the British crown and the only answer they had received had been a repeated injury, which means, the King still considered aggressions to the colonists.

When Jefferson wrote <em>"...That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved..." </em> he is making the strong conclusive statement that from now on, the colonies are declaring independence from the English crown so the colonies are free and independent states, that have the power and rights to do the things they freely consider correct.

8 0
3 years ago
How hopeful do you think Ji-li is at this moment in her story?
Anarel [89]

Explanation:

can you send the prologue please

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the likely purpose of this paragraph?
    10·2 answers
  • The people featured on this movie poster are the movie's
    11·2 answers
  • Why do proper nouns begin with a capital letter
    8·2 answers
  • Antibodies are ____.
    10·2 answers
  • Hich of the following types of business writing would you use to contact a customer about a billing error?
    14·2 answers
  • How do authors use foreshadowing to create suspense?
    5·1 answer
  • Which flaws in his character led to Fortunato's downfall? Montresor's downfall? Explain your
    6·1 answer
  • NO LINKS OR ELSE YOU'LL BE REPORTED!Only answer if you're very good at English.
    10·1 answer
  • Here's the question :))​
    6·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 10
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!