The reapportionment Act of 1929 was passed because membership in the house needed to be capped to prevent an excessive number of members.
On June 11, 1929, the House of Representatives passed the apportionment ACT which adjusted the number of representative as 435. The constitution of the United States called for at least one representative per state and that no more than one representatives for 30,000 persons. The size of state house delegation of a state will consequently relied on its population.
However, the founders were confused as to how large future congress should be after each federal census. The founders were also confused as to the method to be used to reapportion the house.
This uncertainty disturbed the congress as the United States territories widened and its population increased.
Normally, the House of Representatives reapportion itself in a way that didn’t affect the representation of most states. However, the method of calculating apportionment really affected the rural states by losing their representation to larger urbanized states.
Following 1920 census, the house was not able to apportion itself because of a battle that broke out among the rural and urban factions. On June 18, 1929, the house passed the permanent apportionment, which capped house membership after 1910 census. The act created a procedure whereby house seat were automatically apportioned after every decennial census.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- apportionment
- reapportionment act
- 1910 census
- house membership
Indeed it Is C, many elderly people told oral stories that were passed down so they were treated with more respect
Answer:
a cucumber is a fruit
Explanation:
cucumber is a fruit cause they grow from the flowers of the plant and hold the seeds
Answer:
Explanation:
Remark
Let's look at the two that you can eliminate without much worry. B and C are not going to say much about ecofriendly technologies.
It's between the New Science Lab and A record of Operational Data. The Operational Data might given you a hint about the need to reduce costs, but it won't say much about how to do it.
I would pick D. The science lab has the best chance of employing alternate ways of looking for cost control using ecofriendly technologies. It is a lab after all, and that is the first place one should seek the most modern ideas.
