Shah Reza Pahlavi was a brutal dictator, but his departure did not mean Iran was more free. The Shah was pro-west, and would brutally crack down on any dissent. He was replaced by Ayatollah Khomeini, who helped to install a religous dictatorship in Iran. Everything that the Shah had stood for --- including the western world --- was now seen with open contempt by the government.
Im learning this right now and I think its either a or c. Sorry if im wrong
Few people doubted his legitimacy. Legitimacy in this issue isn't characterized by the mainstream vote, vote tallies, our outrage or individuals quibbling about how the procedure turned out badly. It's characterized by a legitimate procedure that — regardless of the possibility that we contend about regardless of whether the Supreme Court settled on the morally remedy choice—was lawful and inside their domain. He promised of office, the Congress and Executive branch perceived that and hence he was the true blue POTUS. Suppositions on this issue are as unessential as sentiments on the presence of gravity.
These are some of the states that gained their independence
MexicoHaitiColombiaVenezuelaBrazil
