It is possible to exist inherently ambiguous languages generated by unambiguous grammar; however, it is not possible to have ambiguous grammar and unambiguous grammar for the same language: FALSE
<h3>
What is Ambiguous grammar?</h3>
- In computer science, an ambiguous grammar is one in which a string can have more than one leftmost derivation or parse tree, whereas an unambiguous grammar is one in which every valid string has a unique leftmost derivation or parse tree.
- Many languages allow both ambiguous and unambiguous grammar, while others solely allow ambiguous grammar.
- Any non-empty language can accept ambiguous grammar by introducing a duplicate rule or synonym into unambiguous grammar (the only language without ambiguous grammar is the empty language).
- Inherently ambiguous languages formed by the unambiguous grammar are not possible because that is the concept of inherent ambiguity.
- No DCFL is fundamentally ambiguous; every DCFL must have some unambiguous grammar.
Therefore, the statement "it is possible to exist inherently ambiguous languages generated by unambiguous grammar; however, it is not possible to have ambiguous grammar and unambiguous grammar for the same language" is FALSE.
Know more about Ambiguous grammar here:
brainly.com/question/12972361
#SPJ4
The complete question is given below:
It is possible to exist inherently ambiguous languages generated by unambiguous grammar; however, it is not possible to have ambiguous grammar and unambiguous grammar for the same language. TRUE or FALSE.
Answer:
Transnational migrants
Explanation:
Transnational migration describes the process by which people move and settle across international borders, have multiple established networks of connections with country of origin while still maintaining settlement in the "foreign" country as is the case above where Chinese and Turkish people maintain businesses and houses in both countries(origin and foreign)
Explanation:
<em>community</em><em> organization</em><em> </em><em>refers </em><em>to </em><em>organizing</em><em> </em><em>aimed </em><em>at </em><em>making</em><em> </em><em>desired</em><em> </em><em>improvement</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>a </em><em>community</em><em> </em><em>social</em><em> </em><em>health</em><em> </em><em>well </em><em>being</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>overall </em><em>functi</em><em>o</em><em>ning </em>
Answer:
What am I suppose to answer here?
Explanation:
The answer is ego integrity; despair. The last mental clash of Erikson's hypothesis, inner self trustworthiness versus give up, includes dealing with one's life. In Peck's hypothesis, conscience respectability requires that more established grown-ups move past their labor of love, their bodies, and their different characters.