Their immunsystem might be weak or damaged
Answer:
it will make your grade rise
Explanation:
Answer:
The intervention of the supernatural gives Gilgamesh hope that he will defeat Humbab
Explanation:
Based on the excerpt, Enkidu declares that Gilgamesh is protected by the Divine Providence and he shall be with him through every step of the way and guide him when he sets out to duel with Humbaba.
Enkidu further tells Gilgamesh that Lord Shamash would uphold him to defeat his adversary and give him great blessings.
All these happened in Gilgamesh's dream which gives him the courage and elief that he would defeat Humbaba, with the help of the supernatural.
<span>C: Short Answer
They contrast quite a bit. Antigone doesn't mind being forceful and determined. She chooses what is right rather than what is convenient. She does not really go with the flow. In a way, all 5 statements you've given me have truth in them. Being concerned about public opinion is a modern concept, but Ismene will go with what is easiest. She is weak willed in that sense, but I think there are better answers than A.
The second one is not entirely true. Creon's Law is a sore point with Antigone, and she defies it with open anger and a powerful non negotiableness, which leads to her fate at the end. Ismene does defy Creon, so she is not without courage.
C is true too. But by the end she is not so timid. That's the point of comparring these two. They do have similarities.
D This depends entirely on how you see the contrast between civil law and moral principles. The Old Testament for example, sees these as intertwined, and I'm not sure that Sophocles didn't as well.
E is the only one you can eliminate. Antigone is prepared to defend her brother to the end.
So what do you pick? I would pick C, but be aware that it can be incorrect.
</span><span>
</span>
Read the excerpt from President Ronald Reagan’s speech on the night before the 1980 presidential election. I know that tonight the fate of America’s 52 hostages is very much on the minds of all of us. Like you, there is nothing I want more than their safe return—that they will be reunited with their families after this long year of imprisonment. When they have returned, all of us will be turning to the concerns that will determine the course of America in the next four years. A child born this year will begin his or her adult life in what will be the 21st century. What kind of country, what kind of legacy will we leave to these young men and women who will live out America’s third century as a nation? Which techniques does President Reagan use in this excerpt? Select three options.
- pathos
- ethos
- shift
- understatement
- overstatement
Answer:
- Pathos
- Ethos
- Overstatement.
Explanation:
As per the question, the three techniques that Reagan employs in this given excerpt from his speech are pathos(appeal to emotion), ethos(appeal to credibility), and overstatement(an exaggerated statement). He employs to appeal to emotion in order to evoke the emotions of pity and sympathy among the audience towards the 52 hostages and their destiny. While the appeal to character is used to convince them about the validity of his statement. The exaggeration is reflected through the descriptions regarding the 'ensured safety of the hostages and their reunion.'