True or false, we can examine both good and bad examples of human character

History

2 answers:

Amiraneli [1.4K]4 years ago

7 0

Answer: true

Explanation:

We all know that looks matter. What most of us don’t understand is just how much looks matter—and how difficult it is for us to ignore a person’s appearance when making a social judgment.

spayn [35]4 years ago

3 0

True but not because of how they look but how they act and how they are around other people and when you notice what their intentions are

You might be interested in

Here you go! Will mark Brainliest

Amanda [17]

The first awnser is D

6 0

3 years ago

Summarize the mcdonald vs chicago case

Gala2k [10]

McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.

The case arose in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired African American custodian, and others filed suit in U.S. District Court to challenge provisions of a 1982 Chicago law that, among other things, generally banned the new registration of handguns and made registration a prerequisite of possession of a firearm. The next day the National Rifle Association and others filed separate lawsuits challenging the Chicago law and an Oak Park, Ill., law that generally prohibited the possession or carrying of handguns and the carrying of other firearms except rifles or shotguns in one’s home or place of business. Each suit alleged that the law violated the right of individuals to possess and carry weapons, which the Supreme Court had found to be protected by the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). (Anticipating this finding, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed suit on the same morning that the decision in Heller was announced.) The crucial question, however, was whether the Second Amendment is applicable to the states and their political subdivisions. Citing “selective incorporation,” the Supreme Court’s gradual application to the states of most of the protections of the Bill of Rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which prohibits the states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law), the plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment is applicable through that clause as well as through the amendment’s “privileges or immunities” clause (which forbids the states from abridging the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States)

Have a good day, afternoon or night!

~Dreamer1331~

3 0

2 years ago

The president responsible for the

Aleksandr-060686 [28]

I would be D- Truman i think

3 0

3 years ago

The Battle of Austerlitz took place during which war? here's 15 points

Nataliya [291]

The War of the Third Coalition

6 0

3 years ago

Which was a key achievement of the ming Dynasty?

denis23 [38]

Answer:

strengthening the Great Wall of China.

Explanation:

please give me a bainlest

5 0

3 years ago